Skip to main content

Evaluations of Programs with Work-Based Learning

Graduation cap, icon meaning Internships Two-sided arrow pointing right and left, icon meaning Transitional Jobs ID Badge, icon meaning On-the-Job Training Construction helmet, icon meaning Apprenticeships

Research Questions

Get Adobe ReaderOpens in a new window PDF 167KBDigital Version PDF 680KBPrint Version

Print Settings:

  1. Flip on short edge
  2. Fit to page

Internships

Year Up

Year Up prepares disadvantaged young adults aged 18 to 24 for a career in the information technology or financial operations fields. Treatment includes 6 months of technical skills training that is validated and regularly updated by industry partners, classes in business communications, and mentorship. Participants are then placed in a 6-month internship with an industry partner guided by a performance contract. Stipends support participants through training and the internship, and job search assistance is available once the internship ends. Year Up leverages a unique funding scheme, including support from industry partners, to spend about $25,000 on each participant.

Year Up

  • Was the Year Up program model implemented as designed across the program's eight offices?
  • How did employment, training, and related service experiences differ between young adults randomly selected to participate in Year Up (the treatment group) and those who could not access the program (the control group)?
  • What were the effects of access to Year Up on earnings, career-track employment, postsecondary education, and related outcomes? How did these effects vary across subgroups and across the eight local offices?

Year Up

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$1,897 (38%) higher average earnings over 12th and 13th quarters after random assignment*

Shorter Term: 4-5PP increase in the year after program exit*

Longer Term: No stable significant differences past 1 year after exit*

Participants were 28 PP more likely to earn a credential from a college or other educational/licensing institution*

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Year Up

Fein, David, Samuel Dastrup, and Kimberly Burnett. 2021. Still Bridging the Opportunity Divide for Low-Income Youth: Year Up’s Longer-Term Impacts, OPRE Report #2021-56. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Young Adult Internship Program

The Young Adult Internship Program offers subsidized internships to New York City youth aged 16 to 24 who are disconnected from school and work. Participants spend 2–4 weeks in a job readiness training class before placement in an internship for 10–12 weeks. They are paid minimum wage for 25 hours per week during this time. For 9 months after the internship ends, case managers support participants as they pursue employment, education, training, or enlistment in the military.

Young Adult Internship Program

  • How was YAIP designed and operated?
  • What impact did YAIP have on employment and earnings, education and training, and well-being relative to what would have happened in the absence of the program? Did YAIP appear to be more effective for certain subgroups of young people?
  • To what extent do YAIP's costs differ from those expended on behalf of individuals randomly assigned to a control group that could not receive YAIP program services? How does this cost differential relate to the benefits associated with program impacts, if any?

Young Adult Internship Program

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$400 over the 6 months after internships end†

Shorter Term: 3PP increase in 1st quarter after internships end†

Longer Term: No effect past 2nd quarter after internships end

5.1PP increase in permanent employment rate after 1 year†; 4PP increase in self-esteem†

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Young Adult Internship Program

Skemer, Melanie, Arielle Sherman, Sonya Williams, and Danielle Cummings (2017). Reengaging New York City's Disconnected Youth Through Work: Implementation and Early Impacts of the Young Adult Internship Program. OPRE Report 2017-22. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Per Scholas

Per Scholas prepares low-income youth and adults for the CompTIA A+ exam for computer service technicians. Training lasts 15 weeks, totaling 500 hours, and includes “life skills” elements in addition to technical modules. Support services include career counseling, job placement with employer partners, post-employment retention services, and interview attire. Some graduates of the program are offered internships with Per Scholas's computer refurbishing center, and some are placed in internships with employer partners.

Per Scholas

  • Do mature sector-focused programs result in significant labor market gains for low-income, disadvantaged workers and job seekers?
  • Were participants more likely to earn higher wages? Did participants find jobs with better access to benefits?

Per Scholas

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$4,663 over the year after program exit*

Shorter Term: 9PP increase in the year after program end*

Longer Term: Longer term outcomes unavailable

Participants were 12PP more likely to have health insurance‡

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Per Scholas

Maguire, Sheila, Joshua Freely, Carol Clymer, Maureen Conway, and Deena Schwartz (2010). Tuning into Local Labor Markets: Findings from the Sectoral Employment Impact Study. Public Private Ventures (P/PV).

Transitional Jobs

Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO)

A comprehensive employment program for former prisoners based in New York City, the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) provided a paid transitional job opportunity and a suite of supportive services aimed at improving participants' labor market prospects and reducing recidivism. Participants were placed in a 5-day preemployment class, after which they worked in maintenance and repair crews for city and state agencies. They worked 4 days per week and were paid minimum wage at the end of every day. The fifth day was spent meeting with staff and participating in supplementary supportive services. Participants were constantly evaluated by their supervisors, and once they demonstrated good performance on the job, they began work with a job search assistant to find permanent employment.

Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO)

  • Do individuals assigned to the program group, who were given access to CEO's jobs and other services have better outcomes (increased employment and reduced recidivism) than those assigned to the control group, who were offered basic job search assistance at CEO along with other services in the community?
  • If the public invests in CEO, will the program reduce crime and increase employment rates enough to exceed the cost of the investment?

Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

No effect

Shorter Term:No effect in the 1st year after program end

Longer Term: No effect in the 2nd year after program end

Reduced recidivism by 6.9PP over 3 years after random assignment†

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO)

Redcross, Cindy, Megan Millenky, Timothy Rudd, and Valerie Levshin (2012). More Than a Job: Final Results from the Evaluation of the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) Transitional Jobs Program. OPRE Report 2011-18. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Implementation and Early Impacts of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED)

Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED) has two tiers of subsidized employment for welfare recipients in Minnesota. Recipients deemed less job-ready are placed in public/nonprofit positions at $9/hour, 24 hours per week, for up to 8 weeks total. More job-ready recipients are placed in subsidized employment positions with private employers paying up to $15/hour with up to 40 hours per week. The control group has access to the same case management and employment services and are excluded only from subsidized employment.

Implementation and Early Impacts of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED)

  • How did MSTED affect participants' receipt of services, employment-related outcomes, income, and personal well-being relative to what could have happened to study sample members in the absence of the program?
  • Does the program appear to be more effective for specific participant subgroups?
  • What is the cost of MSTED?

Implementation and Early Impacts of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

No effect on earnings in the year following random assignment

6 PP increase in private sector unsubsidized employment in 5th quarter after random assignment ‡

  • No difference in self-reported well-being
  • No difference in TANF or SNAP receipt

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Implementation and Early Impacts of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED)

Farrell, Mary & Webster, Riley (2019). Implementation and Early Impacts of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration. MDRC. OPRE Report, 68, 2019. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Transitional Work Corporation (TWC)

The Transitional Work Corporation (TWC) gave long-term Temporary Assistance for Needy Families recipients transitional jobs and other employment services in an effort to improve participants' labor market prospects and reduce welfare caseloads. TWC's program began with a 2-week orientation on job-readiness skills, after which participants were placed in a transitional job, usually with a government or nonprofit agency, earning minimum wage for up to 6 months. Each week, participants were required to work 25 hours and put 10 hours into activities such as job search, job readiness instruction, or GED exam preparation. Once participants found a permanent job, TWC provided them with job retention services and bonus payments at 6 and 9 months.

Transitional Work Corporation (TWC)

Is the TWC program model an effective strategy for increasing employment and earnings and reducing welfare receipt?

Transitional Work Corporation (TWC)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

No effect

Shorter Term: No effect in the 1st year after program end

Longer Term: No effect in the 3rd year after program end

TANF & SNAP receipts decreased early on, but effects faded after 6 quarters

Transitional Work Corporation (TWC)

Jacobs, Erin, and Dan Bloom (2011). Alternative Employment Strategies for Hard-to-Employ TANF Recipients: Final Results from a Test of Transitional Jobs and Preemployment Services in Philadelphia. OPRE Report 2011-19, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Personal Roads to Individual Deployment and Employment (PRIDE)

The Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) program focused on welfare recipients who claimed exemption from work requirements due to a medical problem, but who were determined through medical evaluation to be “employable with limitations.” From there, participants were placed into one of two tracks: vocational rehabilitation for those with the most significant medical barriers, or work-based education for those with literacy, education, or language barriers. People in both tracks performed unpaid work 3 days per week, with the vocational track performing individualized activities 2 days per week, and the work-based education track performing a classroom-based education activity. Both tracks received job search assistance once they were deemed job ready. Staff followed up with participants for 6 months after they were placed in a permanent job.

Personal Roads to Individual Deployment and Employment (PRIDE)

  • Implementation. What services does the program provide? How are those services delivered? Who receives them? How are problems addressed?
  • Impacts. To what extent does the program improve employment rates, job retention, advancement, and other key outcomes? Looking across programs, which approaches are most effective, and for whom?

Personal Roads to Individual Deployment and Employment (PRIDE)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

No effect

Shorter Term: 4.3PP increase in the 1st year after random assignment*

Longer Term: 5.1PP increase in the 2nd year after random assignment*

$818 decrease in cash assistance over 2 years after random assignment*

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Personal Roads to Individual Deployment and Employment (PRIDE)

Bloom, Dan, Cynthia Miller, and Gilda Azurdia (2007). The Employment Retention and Advancement Project: Results from the Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) Program in New York City. MDRC. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD)

The Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD) provided newly released prisoners with temporary minimum-wage jobs offering 30-40 hours of paid work per week. While programs in the demonstration differed slightly across the four implementation sites, generally the jobs were not focused on building occupational skills. Rather, they were aimed at addressing behavior and performance issues that may have emerged. Ancillary services and supports included job search assistance. Two of the sites offered retention bonuses for holding a permanent job for 6 to 9 months. The evaluation created two treatment groups, which allowed it to isolate the effects of the transitional job placements from the effects of permanent job placement services only.

Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD)

  • How did the transitional jobs program affect employment and recidivism during the two years after people entered the study?

Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

No effect

Shorter Term: No effect in 1st year after program end

Longer Term: Longer term outcomes unavailable

Employment retention bonuses boosted earnings by $1,999 over 2 years‡

Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration (TJRD)

Jacobs, Erin (2012). Returning from Work After Prison: Final Results from the Transitional Jobs Reentry Demonstration. MDRC.

An Introduction to the World of Work a Study of the Implementation and Impacts of New York City’s Summer Youth Employment Program (NY SYEP)

New York City's Summer Youth Employment Program uses a lottery system to place tens of thousands of youths aged 14 to 24 into 8 weeks of entry-level employment across a wide range of settings and tasks.

An Introduction to the World of Work a Study of the Implementation and Impacts of New York City’s Summer Youth Employment Program (NY SYEP)

What are the impacts of the SYEP on youth employment, earnings, and educational outcomes?

An Introduction to the World of Work a Study of the Implementation and Impacts of New York City’s Summer Youth Employment Program (NY SYEP)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes
  • Shorter Term: $580 earnings increase during summer of employment*
  • Longer Term: $40 (3%) earnings decrease in Follow Up Years 1‡ and 2†
  • No significant differences in Follow Up Years 3-5
  • Shorter Term: 54PP increase in employment rate during summer of employment*
  • Longer Term: 0.9PP higher employment rate in Follow Up Year 1†, 0.5PP in Follow Up Year 2‡
  • No significant differences in Follow Up Years 3-5

No effect on school attendance or high school credential attainment in follow up years

An Introduction to the World of Work a Study of the Implementation and Impacts of New York City’s Summer Youth Employment Program (NY SYEP)

Valentine, Erin Jacobs, Chloe Anderson, Farhana Hossain, and Rebecca Unterman, (2017). An Introduction to the World of Work: A Study of the Implementation and Impacts of New York City’s Summer Youth Employment Program. MDRC. Chief Evaluation Office, U.S. Department of Labor.

On-the-Job Training

South Dakota WIA OJT

This quasi-experimental evaluation looks at the employment and earnings results of Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA) on-the-job training (OJT) in South Dakota. Workers in an OJT program are placed with a firm for a trial period stipulated in an employment contract between the firm and the state, in which the state subsidizes a percentage of the worker's wages. Typical contracts last 480 hours, while the maximum is 1,040. After the hours are completed, the firm has an option to retain the worker without the wage subsidy.

South Dakota WIA OJT

  • Can training programs effectively influence the employment prospects of trainees at an advanced stage in their work lives?
  • Dislocated workers versus the non-dislocated jobless: Who benefited more from training?

South Dakota WIA OJT

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$567 in the 3rd quarter after program exit†

Shorter Term: 8.6PP increase 1st quarter after program exit*

Longer Term: 7.4PP increase 3rd quarter after program exit†

Women saw 2.3x more earnings gains† and 1.5x more employment rate gains than men (after 3 quarters)†

Note: Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

South Dakota WIA OJT

McEntaffer, M. J. (2015). The Promise of Worker Training: New Insights into the Effects of Government Funded Training Programs (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln).

Testing Two Subsidized Employment Models for TANF Recipients (SEP)

Two subsidized employment models were compared against each other and a control group, all composed of TANF recipients in Los Angeles. Participants in the Paid Work Experience (PWE) group received a 6-month subsidized employment position with a nonprofit or public employer. Another group (OJT) received subsidized placements with private employers. The control group was able to receive job search and job-readiness preparation, vocational training and education, and remedial education services.

Testing Two Subsidized Employment Models for TANF Recipients (SEP)

  • What are the effects of the two models on employment and earnings, TANF receipt, combined income, and overall well-being, relative to what would have happened in the absence of the subsidized employment program?
  • Which of the two models appears to be more effective, and for which population subgroups?
  • To what extent do the costs of the two models differ from the amounts spent on those who were not offered the program services? How does this cost differential relate to the benefits?

Testing Two Subsidized Employment Models for TANF Recipients (SEP)

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes
  • No effect on earnings in the last year of follow-up for either group (admin data)
  • Paid work experience group 4PP more likely to earn a wage over $12/hour (survey) ‡
  • No effect on employment rates 30 months after random assignment for either group (survey)
  • Paid work experience group 4PP higher employment rate in last year of follow-up (admin data) ‡
  • Paid work experience group 8PP more likely to work at least 34 hours per week after 30 months (survey)*
  • Paid work experience group saw improved outcomes relative to the control group, while the OJT group largely did not.
  • $245 (8%) decrease in TANF receipt among paid work experience group in the last year of follow-up (admin data) ‡
  • Employment and earnings outcomes are best for participants with limited prior work experience

Note: Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Testing Two Subsidized Employment Models for TANF Recipients (SEP)

Anderson, Chloe, Mary Farrell, Asaph Glosser and Bret Barden, (2019). Testing Two Subsidized Employment Models for TANF Recipients: Final Impacts and Costs of the Los Angeles County Transitional Subsidized Employment Program. OPRE Report 2019-71. Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Apprenticeships

Washington State Apprenticeship

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) is an occupational-based career training program combining a curriculum of technical instruction with structured on-the-job training. Each RA is tailored to the needs of an employer, who hires the apprentice and commits to training him or her over the long term. Apprenticeships become registered with the U.S. Department of Labor or the appropriate state apprenticeship agency once employers submit standards, or detailed descriptions of the curriculum, on-the-job training plans, and the hours of each that are required for completion. Wage progressions are often a feature of RAs, but they are not a requirement. When participants complete their hours of instruction and on-the-job training, they are granted an industry-recognized credential that nationally certifies them in a specific occupation, such as an electrician or a plumber and pipe fitter.

This study evaluated RA in the state of Washington, looking at earnings, employment rates, and other related outcomes. It also performs a cost-benefit analysis of the dollars Washington puts into RA.

Washington State Apprenticeship

  • Can participants' successes be attributed to participation in the program or might some other factor coincidental to the program have played a role?

Washington State Apprenticeship

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$3,243 per quarter in 1st–3rd quarters after exit*; $3,511 per quarter in 9th–12th quarters after exit* (in 2005 dollars)

Shorter Term: 7.8PP increase over 1st–3rd quarters after program exit*

Longer Term: 9.8PP increase over 9th–12th quarters after program exit*

Hours worked per quarter increased by 37 in 1st–3rd quarters after exit; 51 in 9th–12th quarters†

Note: Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Washington State Apprenticeship

Hollenbeck, Kevin and Wei-Jang Huang (2014). Net Impact and Benefit-Cost Estimates of the Workforce Development System in Washington State. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) in 10 States

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) is an occupational-based career training program combining a curriculum of technical instruction with structured on-the-job training. Each RA is tailored to the needs of an employer, who hires the apprentice and commits to training him or her over the long term. Apprenticeships become registered with the U.S. Department of Labor or the appropriate state apprenticeship agency once employers submit standards, or detailed descriptions of the curriculum, on-the-job training plans, and the hours of each that are required for completion. Wage progressions are often a feature of RAs, but they are not a requirement. When participants complete their hours of instruction and on-the-job training, they are granted an industry-recognized credential that nationally certifies them in a specific occupation, such as an electrician or a plumber and pipe fitter.

This study evaluated the U.S. Department of Labor's RA program across 10 states, looking at earnings, employment rates, and other related outcomes. It also performs a cost-benefit analysis of the federal RA program in those 10 states.

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) in 10 States

  1. Is RA effective in raising the annual earnings and employment of participants?
  2. Do the total social benefits of RA outweigh the total social costs?
  3. What are the experiences of women in RA and what can be done to further promote their success in the program?
  4. Are there differences between the RA programs of states administered by the OA and of states administered by SAAs?

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) in 10 States

Outcomes as compared to non-participants
Earnings Gains Employment Rates Other Outcomes

$6,595 in 6th year after RA enrollment*; $5,839 in 9th*; estimated $98,718 over a career*

Shorter Term: 2.5PP increase in 6th year after RA enrollment*

Longer Term: 1.9PP decrease in 9th year after RA enrollment*

Net social benefits of RA are $58,888 in 9th year; $124,057 estimated over a career

Note: Statistical significances levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Registered Apprenticeship (RA) in 10 States

Reed, Debbie, Albert Yung-Hsu Liu, Rebeccan Kleinman, Annalisa Mastri, Davin Reed, Samina Sattar, Jessica Ziegler, (2012). An Effectiveness Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Registered Apprenticeship in 10 States. Mathematica Policy Research. Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.

Target Population

Icon - Young adult with backwards baseball cap Disconnected Youth

Icon - Adult figure Disconnected Adults

Icon - Building with columns and triangular top Welfare Recipients

Icon - Unlocked handcuff and chain Ex-Offenders

Work-Based Learning Models

Internships Paid, subsidized, or unpaid short term work experience

Transitional Jobs Temporary, subsidized jobs that usually focus on adults with multiple barriers to employment (ex-offenders, TANF recipients, etc)

On-the-Job Training Subsidized jobs for new hires to compensate for on-the-job training costs

Apprenticeship On-the-job training combined with formal job-related instruction, often connected to national skills certificates

Methodologies

RCT

Randomized Controlled Trial
People are randomly assigned to participate or not participate in a program

QED

Quasi-Experimental Design
Program participants are compared to non-participants who are selected because they closely match the participants' demographics and economic situation

Statistical significance levels are measured as follows: * = .01, † = .05, ‡ = .10

Glossary

RA

Registered Apprenticeship

PP

Percentage Points

TANF

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

SNAP

Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program

Where We Looked

thumbnail image
Description below

Image Explanation:
A large pool of government-collected evaluations were drawn from when choosing the 11 studies featured on this infographic. In the Workforce System Strategies community on the Department of Labor's WorkforceGPS site, the 194 resources under the “Registered Apprenticeship / Work-based Learning” subcategory were considered as well as the 94 resources under the “Experimental Impact Analyses / Random Control Trials” ” subcategory. In the Clearinghouse for Labor Evaluation and Research, or CLEAR, the 6 resources under the “Apprenticeship and OJT” subcategory were considered.

Click the image above to see a larger version

This info-sheet highlights results from rigorous research studies on programs that include work based learning strategies. These studies were identified through a search of the U.S. Department of Labor's WorkforceGPS and Clearinghouse for Labor Evaluations and Research (CLEAR). See search terms under “Where we Looked.”